Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Daniel - you are absolutely right. I should have "moved" forward. Just did a crop to take out the grass, stalks etc. Many thanks for the advice: > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Hugh+Thompson/PAW/L1020327 > +_1_.jpg.html Hugh On 7-Jan-07, at 1:26 AM, Daniel Ridings wrote: > Maybe, maybe ... cut the foreground. A few steps closer to the water, > including only water and sky in the frame, grey, dreary, with Toronto > in the background ... that might have worked better for me. The grass > in the foreground doesn't work for the picture. I think a frame > dominated by your impressive sky, bleak water, broken up by the > horizon and Toronto ... I think that would have worked out well. > > Love the sky. That's why I want to see more of it and less of the > grass. > > Daniel > > On 1/7/07, Hugh Thompson <hewthompson@mac.com> wrote: >> Like many other's I say right now that I will put up a new image >> every week ...... that's what I say right now: >> >> first PAW ...... Toronto on the horizon: >> >> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Hugh+Thompson/PAW/ >> L1020327.jpg.html >> >> Hugh >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information