Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: M8's high price
From: lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin)
Date: Sat Jan 13 07:27:39 2007
References: <200701130610.l0D69cSs040789@server1.waverley.reid.org>

A Leica fable re the price of the M8. (and Rolex watches, Mont Blanc  
pens, and all cosmetic products.)

We have a friend, a dealer in modern paintings in New York's trendy  
uptown art market, who is a firm believer in negative price  
elasticity. Since it is almost impossible to tell the absolute  
artistic merit of a contemporary painting, most of her customers use  
price as a surrogate cue to quality. "You get what you pay for" seems  
to be the mantra of the affluent customers who patronize her studio.  
When a painting doesn't sell after a reasonable amount of time, she  
raises its price by several thousand dollars. A customer, returning  
to the studio, notices that the painting is now more expensive than  
it was on the last visit, concludes that the painting must be worth  
having since the price is going up. Out comes the checkbook and the  
painting changes hands before the price increases again. The dealer  
makes a nice profit. The customer hangs the painting on the living  
room wall, confident that everyone will admire his/her good taste.  
"It costs more but I'm worth it."

The painting may be a piece of crap but it doesn't matter. Everyone  
is happy.

Larry Z 

Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re: M8's high price)
Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Re: M8's high price)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: M8's high price)