Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's not polarisation. It's not mechanical vignetting - it's optical vignetting. Here: http://www.leica-camera.us/photography/m_system/lenses/461.html You can access the datasheet. At f5.6 the 28 Summicron retains about 42% of the illumination at the centre for saggittal structures - and that's according to Leica. It will be proportionally worse for wavelengths with lower transmission as these are averaged figures for white light. The other factor that I've noticed is that scanned film can show higher contrast in tonal ranges that do not have high contrast in normally (or even abnormally) developed and chemically printed photos. This sometimes exaggerates the appearance of vignetting - luckily Photoshop can fix it perfectly. The Leica 28/2 is a fantastic design with incredible performance - but as always there are some compromises, the biggest still being cost. In providing maximum contrast and resolution to the edges of a very flat field, one priority the Leica designers chose was to make every element do as much as possible - recent Zeiss designs have greater numbers of elements, each of which contribute less to the final performance. Some are also slower, easiing the design restrictions. The resulting lenses have slightly more distortion in some respects, but resolve more detail albeit with slightly lower contrast. It's a difference in design philosophy that makes a difference that only people who look really closely will notice. 95% of photographers never eve think about it. -- Low Prices, Wide Selection of Gas Masks Everyday low price guarantee. We offer special police discounts and an extremely wide selection of gas masks, filters and huge selection of preparedness gear. http://a8-asy.a8ww.net/a8-ads/adftrclick?redirectid=24e08df2353d2e6cb9bae3a0e3c8c61e