Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/01/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] LUG Book Update, and a Question for the Contributors
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Sat Jan 27 11:46:49 2007
References: <f951d2970701261252t3a965637nd889ffd3649019da@mail.gmail.com> <000001c74190$8e69e870$ab3db950$@net> <a2f8f4470701262322y647f5d97g2f784f3a285e2495@mail.gmail.com> <005801c74230$a15a1f90$e40e5eb0$@net>
On 1/27/07, Jim Shulman <jshul@comcast.net> wrote:
> I appreciate your concern. I've replied to you offline in order to avoid
> turning this LUG thread into a discussion about charities.
And I replied to you, also off-line.
Basically saying: more power to you, Jim.
It is only now I notice that our exchange was off-line. That will
explain the somewhat impersonal tone of my response.
Thanks for your initiative Jim.
Daniel
In reply to:
Message from johnbeeching at gmail.com (John Beeching) ([Leica] A few photos)
Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] LUG Book Update, and a Question for the Contributors)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] LUG Book Update, and a Question for the Contributors)
Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] LUG Book Update, and a Question for the Contributors)