Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/02/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Differences between f1.4 and f2 Summicron 35mm ASPH lenses?
From: ericm at pobox.com (Eric)
Date: Thu Feb 15 01:30:23 2007
References: <20070212120726.QPIG1593.tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net@smtp1.sympatico.ca> <000a01c74ef7$dda6c010$6501a8c0@asus930> <82c9dd70702121542h5bb87dafibc48fcf1a646b73d@mail.gmail.com>
Eric wrote:
>I found the 1.4 35mm a bit too big for my tastes and sold it for a 2.0
Ditto. I think the 35/2 with lens hood is the perfect size for a small,
traveling camera.
--
Eric
http://canid.com/
Replies:
Reply from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Differences between f1.4 and f2 Summicron 35mm ASPH lenses?)
In reply to:
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (vick.ko@sympatico.ca) ([Leica] Differences between f1.4 and f2 Summicron 35mm ASPH lenses?)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Differences between f1.4 and f2 Summicron 35mm ASPH lenses?)
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Differences between f1.4 and f2 Summicron 35mm ASPH lenses?)