Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/02/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: USPS vs. .... was
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Wed Feb 28 13:05:10 2007
References: <20070228.043816.8266.1322082@webmail37.lax.untd.com> <01d101c75b54$95237d60$bf6a7820$@net> <6.1.0.6.2.20070228122732.07b3c5a8@192.168.100.42> <006301c75b7a$5eddf250$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto>
Not to blame USPS at all. With the volume of packages we send within and
outside of US, the failure rate is very low.
At 12:52 PM 2/28/2007, Christopher Williams wrote:
>Well you can't blame it all on USPS when shipping overseas, another
>country's mail service may not be up to par either. I shipped a camera to
>Italy where it arrived after 6 days through USPS Air Parcel. After that it
>took the Italian post 3 weeks to delivery it because it was sent to the
>wrong city 3 times!
>
>Chris
// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please
use richard at imagecraft.com)
Replies:
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Re: USPS vs. .... was)
In reply to:
Message from hankpix at juno.com (hankpix@juno.com) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) (USPS vs. .... was RE: [Leica] (no subject))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: USPS vs. .... was)