Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gene, I may not code my 35 either. I did see cyan creep in my test but it was barely perceptible. It will be the last to go in if at all. Len On Mar 13, 2007, at 8:49 PM, grduprey@mchsi.com wrote: > I would agree with Len, but I'm not sure the 35 even needs coding, > as I see no problems with my 35 and the filter, both those wider It > is needed from what I have read. > > Gene > > -------------- Original message from Leonard Taupier > <len-1@comcast.net>: -------------- > > >> Terry, >> >> I'm only coding my wide angles. Except for seeing which lens was used >> in the EXIF data, I see no reason to code above 35mm. I have filters >> on all my lenses except those which take 60mm filters and see nothing >> wrong with 50mm and above. I can't speak for the Noctilux but I don't >> see vignetting and coding won't make it focus better. >> >> Regards, >> Len >> >> >> On Mar 13, 2007, at 8:18 AM, terry wrote: >> >>> I am wondering what the LUG sees as the big advantage to having all >>> your Leica lenses coded? >>> 28, 35, 50 1.4, 50 1.0, 75, 90 >>> >>> Given the turn around time I received on one lens (28) I am >>> wondering how I would ever schedule the >>> rest imbetween jobs and use. >>> >>> Terry >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information