Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RE: WAS: WTB: Leica CL
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Fri Mar 16 07:51:20 2007
References: <20070316121027.OPGI1612.tomts36-srv.bellnexxia.net@smtp1.sympatico.ca>

My wife dropped it years ago and the shop we let administer the
repair, turned it over to a hack.

I am not sure what he did. When I've tried to get the camera repaired
from other repairmen (reputable), they just send it back explaining it
can't be repaired.

Daniel


On 3/16/07, vick.ko@sympatico.ca <vick.ko@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> What's broken - the RF?
>
> I didn't think that the camera was all that complex.
>
> Vick
> >
> > From: "Daniel Ridings" <dlridings@gmail.com>
> > Date: 2007/03/16 Fri AM 06:32:41 EDT
> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: WAS: WTB: Leica CL
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > Actually ... I have a broke (rangefinder) Leica CL body. I've more or
> > less concluded it would be easier to get a new body than to get this
> > one repaired.
> >
> > I suppose I _could_ guestimate focus. The Rollei 35 has a 40 and
> > you're expected to guess the focus.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (vick.ko@sympatico.ca) ([Leica] RE: WAS: WTB: Leica CL)