Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] A good while ago
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Wed Apr 4 08:27:36 2007
References: <f2f825f20704031927q57f1d2fbu2a4be222dc0910ff@mail.gmail.com>
 
Just for the record - I'm not presenting a "Digital v: Analogue"  
discussion. I totally embrace digital capture. Love it.

My discussion intended only to address the economic considerations of  
digital; and the fact that, unless you're exposing 100's of rolls per  
month, digital capture does not make "economic" sense. It certainly  
makes a good deal of sense in a professional world which demands it;  
as well as for all of it's other ease of use pluses; not to mention  
the blending into our technological lives.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com



On Apr 3, 2007, at 9:27 PM, Victor Rubin wrote:

> Funny, I never thought that my comment would turn into a discussion of
> Digital v. Analogue.
Replies: Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] A good while ago)
 In reply to: Message from vroger at gmail.com (Victor Rubin) ([Leica] A good while ago)