Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] integrity ?
From: ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Tue Apr 17 18:25:25 2007
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20070417203113.00fb0e90@comporium.net>

This really is an impossible discussion with no answer. You must (in  
journalistic photography) not LIE.

But, when you try to nail down the exact edge of lie/truth, it  
disappears.

The very action of deciding on what lens to use, what direction to  
point the camera, what goes in or out of the frame, at what instant  
you press the shutter all distort reality and truth. Photographs  
neither tell the truth nor lie--they simply record what the  
photographer chooses (if the shooter talented and lucky).

What an audience pays for with a good photojournalist is to see the  
world through his (her) eyes--that photographer's interpretation of  
reality--not see reality itself. Perceiving full reality is not even  
possible with being there yourself--filtering always runs.

The ethical calls are sometimes easy, but when you reach the edges,  
they can just as easily be total BS or personal opinion or ignorance.  
It is so much 3AM dormitory noodling.

Ric Carter
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/ricc/





On Apr 17, 2007, at 8:39 PM, Tina Manley wrote:

> At 07:17 PM 4/17/2007, you wrote:
>> I will have to spend some time pondering if removing a distraction  
>> from a photo that does not alter the truthfulness of the image is  
>> wrong.  A removed set of stray legs or a telephone wire does not  
>> seem to me as a way of changing the truth.  Something to think  
>> about for awhile....
>
> An interesting article about truth in photographs:
>
> http://zonezero.com/magazine/articles/mraz/mraz01.html
>
> What do you think?  Does previsualization mean that the photograph  
> was manipulated subconsciously?  I don't think so. I might imagine  
> a photo that I would like to take of a family in Central America,  
> but that would only mean that I would only look for situations to  
> take that photo.  I would never move people into position or change  
> circumstances to make the photo happen when it wouldn't have  
> without my being there.  Moving people into position or suggesting  
> situations or adding lights or manipulating photographs in the  
> darkroom goes way beyond previsualization, to me, and would not be  
> acceptable for documentary or news photographs.  I think many so- 
> called documentary photographs today should be reclassified as art  
> photographs if the situations were manipulated or directed by the  
> photographer.  That is not documentary or news photography.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
> http://www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] integrity ?)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] integrity ?)