Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: M8-not ready for Prime Time (a long and sorrowful lament)
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun May 6 18:00:26 2007
References: <200705061833.l46IWAYh012520@server1.waverley.reid.org> <08723FF4-B418-4D3A-8837-A92060076050@optonline.net> <a3f189160705061545o71f47c9fmbd2cf05facc27936@mail.gmail.com>

On May 6, 2007, at 3:45 PM, Sonny Carter wrote:

> On 5/6/07, Lawrence Zeitlin <lrzeitlin@optonline.net> wrote:
>>
>> I don't know what percentage of the LUG owns M8 cameras but a number
>> of Luggers have complained about glitches, inadequacies, and outright
>> failures.
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------
>
>
> A number  of  Luggers  complained about glitches  with the M7,    
> M6ttl, M6
> and M5 too, also earlier cameras.   .  Most of those glitches got  
> fixed, and
> they go on.  My own new M6 had no  operating film counter out of  
> the box,
> and five years later it failed again.  No other problems that I can
> remember, but that wasn't even electronic.

I took my favorite and trustworthy M7 to Paris... and there had a  
catastrophic failure/jam... on  day 3...of a three week stay...

:-(

I have not had a problem with my M8

:-)

Steve





> ----------------------
>
> I too would be more than a little pissed if my long awaited
>> Leica camera was defective.
>
>
> ---------------------
>
>
> That was the thing that held me back a couple months, and  M8less, I
> expressed some of the same things you and Walt do, until an M8 user  
> offered
> to let me use his for a month.  I did not take him up on that  
> wonderful
> offer, but it made me think about how much he believed in it.  So,  
> I went
> ahaed and got the next one available from Newtonville Camera.
> --------------------
>
> Arbitrarily assuming that 10% of the LUG
>> has purchased the M8 and that only a dozen buyers are unsatisfied,
>> that's a failure rate of about 6%. Far too great for a $5000 prestige
>> camera.
>
> ------------------------
> The key word here is "Arbitrarily."  You base a lot of facts on an  
> arbitrary
> assumption.  I would expect more precision from an engineer.   In  
> my work,
> you need to cite references.
>
> I know that there have been problems and glitches, and I'm sorry  
> that this
> shutter fault has occurred to my pal Jeffery, but  as I have chased an
> answer for him, I cannot find many references to this fault.  There  
> are
> others, but it seems to be relatively rare.
>
> Neither of us have access to worldwide sales, but I'd expect that  
> the number
> of glitches from the total is rather lower than 6%.  I can't prove  
> that, but
> then you have no basis for 6%; just a guess.
> -------------------------
>
> But why so many complaints about a new digital camera when older
> Leicas are cherished for their reliability.
> ----------------------
>
> If they are so reliable,  why does DAG, Sherry,Ken Ruth, and  Leica  
> have
> such a backlog?
>
> While you are correct that some of us have had trouble, the lion's  
> share of
> grousing about the M8  and "why it is such a piece of work" comes from
> people who don't own it. This is a scenario that is played on every  
> forum
> serving Leica users.  Meanwhile, those of us who are using it are  
> finding
> that it shows us the weaknesses of lenses, and our own pilot errors.
>
> I love my M8 because it has returned me to the point that I control  
> the
> picture, and that's something no digital camera offered me before.
>
> Even Jeffery loves his, he just wants it to work right, and that is  
> totally
> understandable. I have no question that it will.
>
>
>>
>>
> -- 
> Regards,
>
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] Re: M8-not ready for Prime Time (a long and sorrowful lament))
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: M8-not ready for Prime Time (a long and sorrowful lament))
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Re: M8-not ready for Prime Time (a long and sorrowful lament))