Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Too Many for PAW 19
From: ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Wed May 16 18:37:15 2007
References: <9BD4F1C4-A70F-4A0C-A9CE-F3FED618A624@mindspring.com> <000601c79820$713cbd90$6501a8c0@asus930>
 
Not quite, actually. That one was shot last week;^) She is a lovely  
thing though.

The 1982 ones are labeled WayBack. Maybe I should break these suckers  
into two albums. I was never quite sure how best to do that.

Thanks for the peek.

ric

On May 16, 2007, at 9:12 PM, G Hopkinson wrote:

> The first one from 1982, actually encapsulates one really  
> significant aspect of photography for me.
> It's a nice casual portrait and not dated, I think. But that lady's  
> baby bump ought now be old enough to be out accomplishing who
> knows what in the world. A genuine frozen sliver of time. That's  
> the way looking at older media always strikes me anyway.
Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Too Many for PAW 19)
 In reply to: Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Too Many for PAW 19)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Too Many for PAW 19)