Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/06/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] for those about to sell their DMR
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Tue Jun 12 00:50:48 2007
References: <82c9dd70706111931x33c1dbdatbff20ee769f90ca2@mail.gmail.com> <f325d3575f4a.466db6ff@shaw.ca> <82c9dd70706120047o58a83c0eya0f85ec76d522dee@mail.gmail.com>

Imacon's chip is great - the DMR experience actually has me looking at
Hasselblad backs.
For studio work, the Hasselblad CFV looks attractive.
The digtal MFback is just starting to make it's descent from nosebleed
altitude pricing.

I stress -- just starting.

Eric


On 6/12/07, Eric Korenman <faneuil@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No remorse. Just observations.
>
> The 5d fits my needs much better at this time.
> Just some observations in sensor chip differences.
>
>  You need the right tool for the right job.
>
> Eric
>
>
>  On 6/11/07, GREG LORENZO <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca> wrote:
> >
> > > For those thinking of selling your DMR:
> > >
> > > But here is my point. That 5d 12 bit sensor just doesn't match up
> > > to the DMR's Imacon 16 bit chip.
> > > I know there are reasons. 16 bit for one. No AA filter. Etc..
> > > But it ain't the same folks. Shadow zones are good but not DMR-super.
> > > Pulling details from the shadow feels like stretching out
> > > cheescloth. It gets thin, noisy and weird.
> > >
> >
> > Seller's remorse and buyer's remorse in one post?
> >
> > Greg J. Lorenzo
> > Calgary, Alberta
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>

In reply to: Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] for those about to sell their DMR)
Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] for those about to sell their DMR)
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] for those about to sell their DMR)