Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] R lens comparison
From: alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal)
Date: Sun Sep 23 20:19:25 2007
References: <46F7140A.5090109@suddenlink.net>
 
IME, the old 21 and 28 lenses and the current 35 & 50/2.0 R lenses, are weak 
in comparision to the corresponding M optics.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jack Maddox" <jmaddox01@suddenlink.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 9:34 PM
Subject: [Leica] R lens comparison


> Hi All,
>
> Having never used a Leica R camera I am curious as to how the R lenses 
> compare with their rangefinder counterparts.
>
> Jack
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] R lens comparison)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] R lens comparison)
 In reply to: Message from jmaddox01 at suddenlink.net (Jack Maddox) ([Leica] R lens comparison)