Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens
From: fredhess at phenix-visuals.nl (Fred Hess / Phenix Visuals NL)
Date: Sun Jan 6 04:48:13 2008
References: <6170667.1199556928363.JavaMail.root@elwamui-little.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <009e01c8503d$05c876f0$b5c19253@Korhonen>

Hello,

There is not something like 'apochromatic' glass. Only apochromatic
lensdesigns,
These APO-lensdesigns show no, or almost none, chromatic aberrations.

If you would like to know more about lensdesign and lensaberrations take a
look in the book of Graham Saxby: The Science of Imaging  ISBN 0-7503-0734-x

Kind regards

Fred Hess.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Raimo K" <raimo.m.korhonen@uusikaupunki.fi>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens


> I find it hard to believe.
> Leitz/Leica have used special glasses for a very long time but as they
know
> glasses and also what apochromatic lens design is they have never used the
> term apochromatic or APO glass.
> For example in G?nter Osterloh?s book Angewandte Leica-Technik there is a
> very thorough description of Apo-Telyt-R 1:3.4/180 mm lens, with
discussion
> of different types of glass like anomal dispersion, calcium fluorite,
> lithium fluorite etc. but no mention about APO glass - the lens is "ein
> ausgezeichnet korrigiertes, apochromatisches system". As is well known,
> Osterloh worked in Leica marketing.
> All the best!
> Raimo K
> Personal photography homepage at:
> http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <wildlightphoto@earthlink.net>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 8:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens
>
>
> > Raimo K <raimo.m.korhonen@uusikaupunki.fi>
> >
> >>Since when do they use this designation?
> >
> > Since 1984 at least if not earlier.
> >
> > Doug Herr
> > Sacramento
> > http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> >
> >>
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: <wildlightphoto@earthlink.net>
> >>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> >>Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 3:17 PM
> >>Subject: Re: [Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens
> >>
> >>
> >>> Raimo K <raimo.m.korhonen@uusikaupunki.fi> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>APO means apochromatic correction of the lens, there are no
apochromatic
> >>>>elements.
> >>>
> >>> In Leica's case, APO is the designation they use for the extra-low
> >>> dispersion glass which their optical designers feel is essential to
> >>> designing lenses with apochromatic performance.  This is like Nikon's
> >>> use
> >>> of the ED designation for their extra-low dispersion glass.  Raimo is
> >>> correct that there are no apochromatic elements, but there is APO
glass
> >>> which is used to design apochromatic lenses.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Doug Herr
> >>> Sacramento
> >>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Leica Users Group.
> >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto@earthlink.net) ([Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens)
Message from raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K) ([Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens)