Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/05/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Auto HDR -- is nobody paying attention?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Fri May 30 16:31:55 2008
References: <20080424234459.ZTHG13948.eastrmmtao102.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>

I believe I've mentioned this before
but I'll say it again
you're using HDR to achieve
wonderful, natural rendering of "reality"
I honor your
admirable craftsmanship

Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07



On Apr 24, 2008, at 6:45 PM, Ken Carney wrote:

> I can usually get an HDR image with a three-shot auto bracket  
> burst, even
> hand-held if I don't have or want the tripod -- assuming nothing is  
> moving
> in the scene, of course.  Sometimes I can improve an image by  
> opening the
> single raw file at, say, -1, 0 and +1 EV and blending.  Photomatix  
> Pro is
> good for this, if used with a light touch.
>
> Here is one made from a single raw file in Photomatix:
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kcarney/mcloud.jpg.html
>
> And one made from three files, hand-held:
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kcarney/mosque.jpg.html
>
> Kyle's idea sounds easier.
>
> Ken
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-
>> bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Henning Wulff
>> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:00 PM
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: RE: [Leica] Auto HDR -- is nobody paying attention?
>>
>> At 12:32 PM -0400 4/24/08, wildlightphoto@earthlink.net wrote:
>>> Kyle Cassidy <kcassidy@asc.upenn.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Light comes through the lens, hits the sensor. As soon as  
>>>> values reach
>>>>  254 the camera should save a file at that exposure which can  
>>>> then be
>>>>  merged (if necessary) with the master file so that burned  
>>>> highlights
>> can
>>>>  be salvaged.
>>>
>>> Or with 16-bit pixels, 65534 instead of 254.
>>
>>
>>
>> The limiting factor is dynamic range, not number of bits. The Fuji S5
>> addresses that to a limited degree, but not to HDR standards.
>>
>> With present sensors and photon acquisition methods it's hard to get
>> real time greater dynamic range. One possibility might be to actually
>> do two exposures during the nominal exposure time. Exposure time
>> would then take on a new meaning, and this clearly wouldn't work when
>> you need an extremely short exposure, but it should be doable when
>> you only need 1/125sec.
>>
>>
>> --
>>     *            Henning J. Wulff
>>    /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>>   /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
>>   |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from simon.apekop at gmail.com (simon jessurun) ([Leica] Auto HDR -- is nobody paying attention?)
In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Auto HDR -- is nobody paying attention?)