Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?
From: lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary)
Date: Wed Jun 11 09:51:48 2008
References: <C4757710.E743%mark@rabinergroup.com> <011201c8cbe2$a80ed190$2acb4c4a@D1S9FY41>
 
When I am shooting for fun with film I prefer to carry a Nikon F3 with 
either the 180 2.8 or 105 2.5 on it and an M6 with anything wider, 
usually my 28.

I really wish I had discovered this combination when I worked news and 
shot film...it is so near perfect it is scary.

Seth Rosner wrote:
> Mark, Sal was quite right about the reach of a 180; but why not just 
> put one on an SL or R6 if size is a question? well, thinking about it, 
> a 180/4 Elmar on Visoflex and an M3 wouldn't be that bulky; unhandy 
> but not that bulky.
-- 
Harrison McClary
Harrison McClary Photography
harrison@mcclary.net
http://www.mcclary.net
ImageStockSouth - Stock Photography
http://www.imagestocksouth.com
Tobacco Road: Personal Blog:
http://www.mcclary.net/blog
Replies: Reply from gpinkcp at msn.com (Gary Pinkerton) ([Leica] Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?)