Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] FOM2
From: afirkin at afirkin.com (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Tue Jun 17 20:53:54 2008

Yes, FOM2 really bridged the time between cumbersome and expensive digital 
solutions and practical and useful ones. It changed the scope of the 
submissions, but I don't think it hurt the variety of the results in fact I 
think it helped to give greater scope to the final selection.

Cheers

--- s.dimitrov@charter.net wrote:

From: slobodan dimitrov <s.dimitrov@charter.net>
To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
Subject: Re: [Leica] FOM2
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:27:20 -0700

An earlier era, replete with DMR missteps and the absence of a  
digital M.
s.d.

On Jun 17, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Michiel Fokkema wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just finished looking and reading the book.
> It is magnificent. The pictures, the layout, all very good.
> Very good job by Alastair. We should be grateful he made this into  
> this book.
>
> A few things that struck me. Digital is almost absent. M6 rules, as  
> the 35 and 50mm lens.
>
> Thanks again Alastair.
>
> Michiel Fokkema
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information