Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Oh well I suppose you are right on the cost factor. Accept I bought mine when it was new to the world and it was the first or second Noctilux sold in Canada where they were made. :-) I still use it both on the M8 and M6! Trust me it wasn't that much in those days. But we're not here to compare the lenses because I'd use one or the other or both just for the hell of it to cause mischief. :-) "Like how did he do that?" ted -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Philip Forrest Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 3:27 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON I think the Noctilux is just too good and won't glow like the Canon .95. Sometimes lenses can be made too well and the Nocti vs. .95 Canon is perfect example. Also, at 1/10 the price, the Canon wins in my book. PhilFo _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1514 - Release Date: 6/23/2008 7:17 AM