Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Ah! Back to the Great Filter Dispute!
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor)
Date: Thu Jun 26 10:37:44 2008
References: <4AB109A52C71420B8131F60C014A7651@xyw> <C488B05D.13402%mark@rabinergroup.com> <000001c8d758$acc7d390$6b01a8c0@dadquad> <200806261300.m5QD0ZLY025689@server1.waverley.reid.org> <000a01c8d793$c8e69c60$6b01a8c0@dadquad> <a3f189160806260711n338528f9rf83953a619c53ce1@mail.gmail.com> <4B43510F-6837-4774-8797-3E9B4DA2C21D@comcast.net> <p0623091ac48976971657@[10.1.16.146]>

I'm referring to modern Nikkors in this case.  I haven't tried it with  
the Nikkors but my GRD2 underexposes by a a stop to a stop and a half  
out on the water.   If I remember to do it, I'll try the lenses with  
and without the filters to see if there is a difference when I'm down  
on the Cape this weekend.


Regards,

Dick



On Jun 26, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Henning Wulff wrote:

> At 10:42 AM -0400 6/26/08, Richard Taylor wrote:
>> Working from boats and at the seashore I find that a UV filter  
>> reduces the tendency towards underexposure caused by all that open  
>> sky.  It also keeps salty spray off the front element.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dick
>>
>
> Richard,
>
> Under your shooting circumstances putting a protective filter on  
> makes sense, as salt spray doesn't help any equipment, and can be a  
> pain to get off.
>
> On the other hand on the topic of a UV filter reducing the tendency  
> to overexposure: I don't believe you....if you are using a Leica  
> lens produced in the last 30 years. All Leica lenses have a UV  
> blocking function built in.
>
> -- 
>   *            Henning J. Wulff
>  /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
> /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
> |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) (Are UV Filters Needed for Proper Exposure on the Water? [was Re: [Leica] Ah! Back to the Great Filter Dispute!])
In reply to: Message from alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] 21mm M Biogon question)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 21mm M Biogon question)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] 21mm M Biogon question)
Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] Ah! Back to the Great Filter Dispte!)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Ah! Back to the Great Filter Dispute!)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Ah! Back to the Great Filter Dispute!)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Ah! Back to the Great Filter Dispute!)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Ah! Back to the Great Filter Dispute!)