Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/07/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Paris....Photos Illegal? Why?
From: gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo)
Date: Tue Jul 15 21:47:19 2008
References: <1707A475-1148-4396-B25C-CA5D71D545A6@cox.net> <487CF95A.4090400@wanadoo.nl> <487D0651.3030409@san.rr.com> <C513CEC8-4978-4B20-8915-34D63BF8EDD7@pix-that-stimulate.com> <0DF01474-A333-4122-9C02-CBBE89EACAE9@cox.net> <8FBE6BFD-730A-47D6-ABF7-3616F9AF4B04@pix-that-stimulate.com>
Here's a recent article (in French) on the subject from Le Figaro:
http://www.lefigaro.fr/culture/20070827.FIG000000299_le_sacro_saint_droit_a_l_image_battu_en_breche.html
It looks like the publication must be detrimental (to the subject) to be
illegal.
To paraphrase Tina. No photos of women speaking and chewing their food
simultaneously.
Greg Lorenzo
Calgary, Canada
_________________________________________________________________
Need to know now? Get instant answers with Windows Live Messenger.
http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger_072008
Replies:
Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Paris....Photos Illegal? Why?)
In reply to:
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] flying in Paris....)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] flying in Paris....)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] Paris....Potos Illegal? Why?)
Message from tarek.charara at pix-that-stimulate.com (Tarek Charara) ([Leica] Paris....Potos Illegal? Why?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Re:Leica]Paris....Photos Illegal? Why?)
Message from tarek.charara at pix-that-stimulate.com (Tarek Charara) ([Leica] Re:Leica]Paris....Photos Illegal? Why?)