Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Black & White film portraiture making a comeback? WAS: <sigh> Getting into printing.. need advice?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon Sep 8 18:56:17 2008

I'm sure some portrait people are marketing darkroom prints like its this
rare thing you gotta have that your neighbors wont be getting.
Just like you can have yourself shot with an 8x10 camera and be printed in
platinum.
I'd pay for that if I had the money.
But sooner or later I'd rent an 8x10 camera for a weekend.
I'd shoot c41.
Then scan the negs with my flatbed.

I'd be satisfied.
I'd have a satisfied mind.

Get portrized with some substantiality yea that's the ticket!!

I saw the Koudelka show at the Aperture Gallery in Chelsea last Thursday.
It was the biggest Gallery day of the year. First Thursday of September in
Chelsea, the center of the gallery thing in Manhattan.

Black and white 17x22 inkjet prints; from all I could tell;
Didn't bring my loupe.

They were gorgeous.

They looked too good to be darkroom prints.

About the tanks moving into Checkloslavakia.

Was shot on Tri x with a brassy Leica.

Printed with an Epson.
No doubt.

Was not called "tanks for the memories".

I had to walk up four flights of stairs.
It was worth it.



mark@rabinergroup.com
Mark William Rabiner



> From: Adam Bridge <abridge@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:23:46 -0700
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: [Leica] Black & White film portraiture making a comeback? WAS: 
> <sigh>
> Getting into printing.. need advice?
> 
> I'm sorry you chose to share your thoughts off-line Philip since they
> are lost to the community at large now. Perhaps you would consider
> posting them here so they go into the archives for others who wish to
> learn from your own experience.
> 
> And, I'm hoping, the original poster will write back and talk to us
> about his experiences setting up his darkroom. I'm certain many of us
> will be interested.
> 
> I greatly appreciate the dark room as a fundamental to photography. I
> have to think that real silver-gel prints made from real film in a
> real darkroom will make a real resurgence in the upscale portraiture
> market -- if they haven't already. Mark R. might be able to give us a
> glimpse of the NYC market.
> 
> Mark is black and white portraiture, on film, printed on
> silver-gelatin fiber paper making it there?
> 
> How about others in cities where the wealth is?
> 
> To me the hands-on nature of the medium is so intense it would have to
> make an impact. Perhaps as the economies pick up and the awareness
> seeps into the upper-middle class.
> 
> Anyway, sorry to change the subject
> 
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Philip Forrest
> <photo.forrest@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Ha ha ha ha ha!
>> It's little nuggets like this and the thread thereafter that make me
>> want to fall off this LUG wagon and just make photos. There's probably
>> a lot of people who responded off list (as did I) giving advice on
>> darkroom work.
>> The funny thing about the LUG is that there is very little gray here.
>> Black or white. I'm right you're wrong. The whole idea of a forum is
>> just that, it's a forum where ideas can be shared and art can be
>> cultivated. Much of what travels around here though is some air of
>> superiority/seniority/highfalutin crap. There's a lot of talented
>> photographers here on the LUG. I respect them and their work. There's a
>> lot of tree bark and peeling paint too. Lots of "my Cooke-Amotal will
>> beat my 1st gen Summicron." etc...
>> There is a certain little bit of satisfaction of collecting anything,
>> but every camera and lens I personally have owned, fixed or built, I
>> have used to make images. Some I still have, some I cut up with an
>> angle grinder and dremel tool, some I sold. Too often this is not a
>> Leica Users' Group, it's a Snobbish Collectors' Group. I'm not a
>> collector, I'm a user. I don't have any equipment in a vault still in
>> a box. I don't collect boxes, I throw them away, helping you box
>> collectors by boosting the value of whatever cellulose you've
>> squirreled away for some foolish reason. All my lenses are used.
>> Heavily. I've never written a book on my lenses or anybody elses'. I
>> share some of the imagery I make with the group and get a little
>> feedback to grow from.
>> I'm so sick of some of these threads such as this, that I could
>> projectile vomit.
>> I don't care what music you're listening to while drinking whatever it
>> is you're drinking sitting under your OC light.
>> I listen to Nirvana, Pearl Jam and a few other "grunge" groups when I'm
>> printing, but I don't talk about it here. Sometimes a little bit of
>> Jazz, sometimes NPR. I drink water from beer glasses I collected while
>> in the Navy but don't talk about it here.
>> Why?
>> Because nobody cares. Or more importantly, nobody SHOULD care.
>> It's about making art. That's narcissistic enough; we don't need to
>> hear what cigar goes best with the nose of Dektol. Making photos. If
>> that's done with a pinhole, great; if that's done with a Leica, great;
>> if that's done with the Hubble Space Telescope, great.
>> Besides the few people in dirty, muddy shoes (like Tina,
>> showing us beauty in the harshest adversity) the
>> rest of us who point fingers should be ashamed. I'm pointing
>> everywhere, so I'll start with myself. I'm just so sick of the stigma
>> that I feel because I choose to shoot a Leica, the very pinnacle of
>> snobbish image making devices. That stigma comes from here.
>> Go make some photos, people.
>> Phil Forrest
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> A fellow asks us to share our thoughts on how to
>> set up a chemical darkroom.  So far, most of the
>> responses have been from digital people who are
>> stating how much they hate darkroom work.  That
>> is so much sour grapes and is not responsive to the question asked.
>> 
>> First, can you digital folks stand aside or, if
>> you insist, set up your OWN thread of "Why I Hate
>> Analog Work" or the like.  Otherwise, keep your
>> bitter, vicious, and nasty thoughts to
>> yourself.  It is a BIG universe and one easily
>> capable of including those of us who LIKE analog
>> work, those of us who are incapable of adapting
>> to digital, and those who like digital
>> work.  Heck, the universe is big enough to
>> include the 95% of folks who use and like PC's
>> and the 5% who like and use Mac's.  As they say,
>> your mileage may vary, but, in the end, it IS a
>> large and inclusive universe.  I suspect that
>> most LUG subscribers do not own or wear or have
>> ever seen a Tilley Hat, but we do spend a LOT of
>> time talking about these as if they were the
>> end-all and be-all of existence, not to mention
>> those specialty shoes Tina wears.  (Me?  I do
>> analog, cannot figure out digital, use a PC,
>> walked around yesterday in Hannah without a hat
>> on at all, and spend ten months of the year barefoot -- retirement is 
>> great.)
>> 
>> Second, let us not pour urine on an enquiring
>> mind who wants to get into a chemical
>> darkroom.  Encouragement is in order, not tales
>> of how much some of you HATED the experience.  I
>> would never discourage someone from going
>> digital:  if they are happy to accept the
>> constraints, that is their choice and more power
>> to them.  Others are happy to accept the
>> constraints of analog and more power to them, as well.
>> 
>> Third, I fill my time in the dark room listening
>> to classical music or old radio shows.  I
>> happened to be in the dark room when they
>> announced that Stephane Grappelli had died.-- I
>> am not wild about Jazz Violin but I did get a
>> grand two-hour remembrance of his work on my
>> local NPR station while whomping up several dozen
>> prints and a couple of rolls of film to
>> boot.  Duffy's Tavern is a great listen as is the
>> radio Dragnet or Tales of the Texas
>> Rangers.   Mozart, Hayden, Bach, Handel ...
>> anything but the gagging nastiness of piano
>> sonatas.  Those put me to sleep when they do not make me physically 
>> nauseous.
>> 
>> Marc
>> 
>> 
>> msmall@aya.yale.edu
>> Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Black & White film portraiture making a comeback? WAS: <sigh> Getting into printing.. need advice?)
Reply from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] Black & White film portraiture making a comeback?WAS: <sigh> Getting into printing.. need advice?)
In reply to: Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Black & White film portraiture making a comeback? WAS: <sigh> Getting into printing.. need advice?)