Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/10/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Bad luck with chrome 50/2 rigid Summicrons
From: alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal)
Date: Tue Oct 7 06:42:06 2008
References: <48EB5C87.6040601@sympatico.ca>

Concentric rings are a sign of decementing. The first series Summicrons, 
rigid and DR, are quite prone to this. There are repair shops that will 
clean and recement the elements
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vick Ko" <vick.ko@sympatico.ca>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 07 October, 2008 8:56 AM
Subject: [Leica] Bad luck with chrome 50/2 rigid Summicrons


>I am running into a streak of bad luck with my 50/2 rigid Summicrons.
>
> First, I find my old DR Summicron has coating degradation - a light 
> fuzziness on the front coating I look closely at it.
>
> Then I check a 50/2 rigid chrome lens - it has the coating degradation but 
> to a lesser degree.  Then looking inside, it has concentric rings of some 
> haze.  It doesn't look like the rainbow rings of doublet separation.  They 
> look literally like large concentric rings of haze.  Have you heard of 
> this "rings" phenomena?
>
> Both might be destined to the "bay "as is" sales category.   :-(
>
> That or they are my "extra glow" 50/2's.
>
> Vick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Bad luck with chrome 50/2 rigid Summicrons)