Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/10/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Frank, In my experience I have only used two 21 the Super Angulon R f4/21mm and the Elmarit M. IMO the Super Angulon was a much better lens, much more rich in contrast and tones, never vigneting. I don't know how is the quality of the M one or the F3,4, if it is the same I think is better. On the other hand I think that the 21 M ASPH has solved the vigneting problems... I think that M6, 7 and MP the meter don't works with the F3,4 But frequently to appreciate the lens qualities is a question of time... Let us know your decision and test please Saludos cordiales Lluis El 28/10/2008, a las 2:34, Frank Filippone escribi?: > Given the choice of > > 21F4 Super Angulon, > 21F3.4 SA > 21 Elmarit Version # whatever..... > 21 ASPH Elmarit > 21 Zeiss F4.5 > > What is the order of image quality...? > > I remember that Henning said he liked the 21 ASPH Elmarit as #1, > with the 21 > Zeiss as #2..... And that the 21/3.4 SA was way up there..... > > Forget the other choices... ( 21 F1.4 and 21 Zeiss F2,8) > > > Frank Filippone > red735i@earthlink.net > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information