Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] ... and Some Thoughts on the M3
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Sat Nov 1 03:58:44 2008
References: <370105078.1342501225386721152.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu><24709389.1342711225386756932.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <20081030134943.663bcf30@linux-019a.site> <702B2A09F79E44CDBC14461F0A029272@dadquad> <012901c93b20$6c2de870$4489b950$@net>
 
Frank,

I rarey use my 1,25x, IMO they "eat" some brilliance.

About the M3 VF, I've never understod why Leica did not remake it on a  
modern version

Saludos cordiales
Lluis

El 31/10/2008, a las 7:17, Frank Filippone escribi?:

> I agree with the improvement using the 1.25 ( I do not have a 1.4, but
> believe it will work as well....)
>
> However, the 1.4 costs as much as almost any other manufacturer's  
> SLR 50mm
> lens.... !
>
> I guess glass is glass at Leica...
>
> Frank Filippone
> red735i@earthlink.net
>
>
> The magnifiers are VERY helpful with critical DoF on the 50 and up  
> wide open
> as well.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] ... and Some Thoughts on the M3)
Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] ... and Some Thoughts on the M3)