Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Epson's new R2880 printer
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Fri Nov 14 09:20:09 2008
References: <C5427ACF.45210%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Actually
would be nice to refer to them as
50% or whatever % black.

to call them gray
does not reference color bias
as in warm or cool gray

whereas % of black
infers neutral

;~)

Fond regards,
George

george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist



On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:46 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> I also say maybe its just me but isn't light light black a really  
> funnily
> awkward way of saying "gray"?
>
> I think the three "blacks should be called:
>
> 1. Black
> 2. Not so black
> 3. Gray


Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Epson's new R2880 printer)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Epson's new R2880 printer)