Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sun Dec 7 16:34:04 2008
References: <200812071106.mB7B5vSw034467@server1.waverley.reid.org> <BLU121-DS64114E3BADBD34E136738D4FC0@phx.gbl> <493C3D74.8010802@tele2.fr> <B1F97A20-7295-4639-B4C3-D95B99B3807E@mac.com> <493C452A.5060008@tele2.fr>

Well Philippe, when I had my R8
without the DMR I didn't feel betrayed either.
It performed well as a film camera as well.
I'm not sure that one can be betrayed
unless promises are not fulfilled.

I don't recall Leica every promising
to be the "Digital Photography Leader"

If you're anxious to make digital captures
with your R system
I'd bet you could find a DMR
;~)

Fond regards,
George

george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist



On Dec 7, 2008, at 3:50 PM, Philippe AMARD wrote:

> This is where R users have been betrayed.


In reply to: Message from leicar at q.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica)
Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that)
Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that)