Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Unbelievable
From: sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner)
Date: Fri Dec 19 11:39:47 2008
References: <200812191850.mBJIoLOK082794@server1.waverley.reid.org> <F2CB7526-0E54-4567-8BD3-FCBAD125CDFA@optonline.net>

Larry, they wouldn't be Leicas. And they wouldn't sell. Who on earth would 
buy a 'bit of plasticky' Leica when there is so much splendid 'pre-owned' 
equipment in fine operating condition at such bargain prices?

Seth

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lawrence Zeitlin" <lrzeitlin@optonline.net>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Cc: "Lawrence Zeitlin" <lrzeitlin@optonline.net>
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:29 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Unbelievable


> If Leica couldn't find an overwhelming sympathetic audience in the
> LUG, it is unlikely to do so in the general camera using population.
> Leica's plight is similar. on a much smaller scale, to that of the
> U.S. auto industry. Their best bet might be to ask for a bailout or
> bridge loan from the German government and, if they can't return to
> profitability within six months, file for bankruptcy. Their best
> strategy might be to sell the Leica name, patents, and manufacturing
> rights to one of the Japanese camera giants. The precedent has been
> set by Contax, Voightlander, and scores of others. Then perhaps we
> might have affordable Leica cameras, although a bit plasticky.
>
> Larry Z
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1857 - Release Date: 12/19/2008 
10:09 AM


In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)