Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] un-believable
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Fri Dec 19 16:37:34 2008
References: <C4BF7AB3-DB7F-43A5-9A3A-62AFC042AE67@mac.com> <20081219185359.04b33c1a@linux-019a.site> <0DA7A328-EA7B-486C-935A-38EB0A012C8C@ameritech.net> <BD27E035DFBE447E84496BA54E55A369@D1S9FY41> <494C3CC0.2010707@gmail.com>

I usta be an expert when I was your age too.



On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Yama Nawabi <mknawabi.lug@gmail.com> wrote:

> Au contraire! The technology used in the M8 relative to other cameras is
> rubbish. What Dante meant is that you are charging a lot for an engine that
> is old. I agree with him, but you guys can argue all you want!
>
> -Yama
>
>
> Seth Rosner wrote:
>
>> Dante, with great respect, you utterly disqualify your comment and reveal
>> your lack of knowledge of product by equating the Leica M8 to an 
>> (obsolete)
>> Honda Civic. What rubbish.
>>
>> Seth
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dante Stella" <dstella1@ameritech.net
>> >
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 7:07 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] un-believable
>>
>>
>>  I don't even think Leica is even in the same class the US auto
>>> industry - which has as good technology as anyone's but has been
>>> struggling mightily with product mix and cost-effective production.
>>> More importantly, the prices are not out of scale.  Leica, on the
>>> other hand, doesn't even have the technology - and unless you believe
>>> that having Germans assemble it is worth a ton of money,* the prices
>>> are way out of line.  The equivalent of an M8 in the automotive world
>>> would be building a 1997 Civic and selling it today for $60,000.
>>>
>>> Dante
>>>
>>> *Assuming Solms and not Portugal does the work.
>>>
>>> On Dec 19, 2008, at 6:53 PM, Philip Forrest wrote:
>>>
>>>  I don't think it's unbelievable, I think it's hilarious for the
>>>> cult-ish status symbol. I love Leica's products (the ones I own) but I
>>>> also think that they, like the US auto industry, are desperate due to
>>>> lack of innovation and foresight. My M4 will be working long after
>>>> Leica is gone and my lenses will as well. I'm happy with that for now.
>>>> Phil Forrest
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1857 - Release Date:
>> 12/19/2008 10:09 AM
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Regards,

Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
Natchitoches, Louisiana
USA

Replies: Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] un-believable)
Reply from mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi) ([Leica] un-believable)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi) ([Leica] un-believable)