Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Hexanon 50/1.2 vs. 50/1.4 ASPH
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Sun Dec 21 18:57:07 2008
References: <7ac27f4f0812211653l6cc42fb1q9da8d8f6ac0a46e@mail.gmail.com>

Richard, it so happens i have both and i like both. the 50 asph is super
super sharp, the konica lens look and feel is a lot more creamier but sharp.
cost wise the konica one can be had for less. either way you can not got
wrong with either lens.

i enjoy using both and whatever i put on my camera, i have a tough time
taking off. this week i have been shooting with the konica.


On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Richard Man <richard.lists@gmail.com>wrote:

> OK, I believe the 50/1.4 ASPH is one of the finest 50mm lens ever. So what
> do I lose in a 50/1.2 Hexanon? Any personal experience?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
> // b: http://richardfman.wordpress.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
 -------------------------------------
 regards, mehrdad

In reply to: Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Hexanon 50/1.2 vs. 50/1.4 ASPH)