Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 6x17 lust
From: len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Sat Dec 27 06:42:44 2008
References: <C57B9802.472AD%mark@rabinergroup.com> <15552B2DC76D437180E3D8EF35169DDB@D1S9FY41>

Seth,

Hasselblad has a few digital backs. But the sensor for their largest  
39MP back measures 3.67 x 4.9cm, quite a bit smaller then 6x6.

Len


On Dec 27, 2008, at 8:44 AM, Seth Rosner wrote:

> Mark, I'm writing about something about which I know next to  
> nothing; but is there not a digital back for the 6x6 Hasselblad?  
> And I know that the Alpa 12 can be had with a 6x6 digital back.
>
> Seth
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Rabiner"  
> <mark@rabinergroup.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 8:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 6x17 lust
>
>
>> Any 2 and a 1/4 square camera a Rolleiflex or old Hasselblad would  
>> be twice
>> the frame size of the S2 only shooting film instead of just a  
>> capture area.
>>
>> There does not seem to be a medium format system like the traditional
>> Hasselblad in which a digital back you'd get for it is very close  
>> at all to
>> 2 1/4 square. Though some are  hyped as "full frame" digital.  
>> Referring to
>> full frame 645 not 6x6. And not even that.
>> 6x6 =  2 and a 1/4 square
>> Its 6 cm
>>
>> Mark William Rabiner
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: Richard Man <richard.lists@gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:10:51 -0800
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: [Leica] 6x17 lust
>>>
>>> I have no budget right now, but looking at the XPan pics made me  
>>> drool after
>>> this:
>>>
>>> <
>>> http://cgi.ebay.com/Fuji-GX617-Panoramic-Camera-Giant-XPan-BOXED- 
>>> MINT_W0QQitem
>>> Z270320360174QQihZ017QQcategoryZ3351QQssPageNameZWD2VQQrdZ1QQcmdZVie 
>>> wItemQQ_tr
>>> ksidZp1638Q2em122
>>>>
>>>
>>> I know it will be VERY different from the XPan as the XPan is  
>>> handheld
>>> camera whereas 6x17 is get-a-sherpa camera, but oh man, the size  
>>> of the
>>> negatives.....
>>>
>>> Makes S2 looks like a half frame, and the Nikon FX a quarter  
>>> frame and the
>>> 4/3rd a... 16th frame.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
>>> // b: http://rfman.wordpress.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ----------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.0/1865 - Release Date:  
> 12/26/2008 1:01 PM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 6x17 lust)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] 6x17 lust)