Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Eye vs Camera Lens
From: leica at web-options.com (Bob W)
Date: Tue Jan 20 18:52:49 2009
References: <200901210223.BHH30726@rg4.comporium.net>

> 
> LUG:
> 
> B&H has an interesting article:
> 
> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/find/newsLetter/The-Photographic-Eye.jsp
> 
> Includes bokeh information!
> 
> Tina
> 
> Tina Manley
> www.tinamanley.com 
> 

This observation about blurriness, from Herman von Helmholtz's ideas about
human vision, is one of the ideas that P H Emerson brought to photography
when he formalised Pictorialism. While we often think of pictorialism as
unrealistic it is in some ways more realistic than its f/64 secessionist
successors. Emerson's aim was to produce photographs that mimicked our
vision, and that is why he promoted the use of soft focus and shallow depth
of field. 

Bob


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Eye vs. Camera Lens)
Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] IMG: Inauguration)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Eye vs Camera Lens)