Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Painting
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sun Feb 15 23:35:49 2009
References: <200902160135.n1G1Z9Xj047488@server1.waverley.reid.org><E28FD6BF-DF86-4E76-9449-6B781D8A5DEB@optonline.net> <49991313.2070306@tele2.fr>

Hi Philippe,

I sent a note to the more prominent gallery in Nashville, along with photo 
attachments of the painting and the signature.  I hope they can offer some 
enlightenment.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Philippe AMARD" <philippe.amard@tele2.fr>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Painting


>I had never hear of it - but it makes sense to keep canvas perfectly flat 
>... wooden frames tend to move over time (particularly with humidity and 
>changing temperatures), glass also does ( 'drips' in fact) but it takes 
>centuries, cf Cathedral windows.
> I'd be curious to know the final answer though, i.e. the main reason why.
>
> Phx in snowy Metz
> .
>
> Lawrence Zeitlin wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 15, 2009, at 8:35 PM, Jim wrote:
>>
>>> My question is this:  Is this a common practice, backing up canvas  with 
>>> glass?  I have never encountered it before.
>>
>>
>>
>> My artist wife says she never heard of it before either. But just to  be 
>> sure, check with an art framer.
>>
>> Larry Z
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 



In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Painting)
Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] Re: Painting)