Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Bokeh?
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:50:06 -0700
References: <mailman.119.1237387691.976.lug@leica-users.org> <D95E5FAE-852B-40AE-BC84-9C28EDDF8D91@usjet.net>

Did you remove the images, Tina? I tried to click through to them this
morning and got a "Bad Reference" from the site.

Adam

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net> 
wrote:
>
> Tina,
>
> This is very distracting bokeh, more so in the second, but a problem in
> both. ? ?This was an aspherical lens?
>
> Bob
>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:21:01 -0400
>> From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net>
>> Subject: [Leica] IMG: ?Bokeh?
>> To: lug at leica-users.org, paw at micapeak.com, seephoto at micapeak.com,
>> ? ? ? ?digitalusersgroup at yahoogroups.com
>> Message-ID: <200903181221.BNH64211 at rg5.comporium.net>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>>
>> PESO:
>>
>> A question about bokeh in two photos. ?These are straight out of the
>> camera with just levels adjusted. ?Is the bokeh too distracting? ?I
>> deliberately shot wide open to throw the background and foreground
>> out and emphasize the girl on these. ?I have others that are stopped down
>> more.
>>
>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/110355394
>>
>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/110355396
>>
>> More blur or less?
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Tina
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Bokeh?)