Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Not cricket
From: marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small)
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:42:08 -0400
References: <mailman.548.1239037686.976.lug@leica-users.org> <38024DC0-B437-4F35-8D97-7AD5BF06582F@optonline.net> <8A8895E5-3743-443D-BE56-8E94FDDE1AD5@cox.net> <3cad89990904061821v73038e0djd6f209887754d4c9@mail.gmail.com>

At 09:21 PM 4/6/2009, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
 >How is it that college sports is so big in the USA? Except for the
 >Oxford-Cambridge rivalry, nobody gives a s*** for college sports anywhere
 >else in the known universe....

Well, in the US, we do not have our factories 
front semi-pro sports teams as is the rule in a 
lot of Europe.  Cultural differences, I guess.  I 
went to a college, Washington & Lee, which has no 
subsidized athletic scholarships, so we play 
honestly with student athletes.  Then I went to 
Yale for my MA, where they have an inept program 
of athletic scholarships.  Then I got my JD at 
William & Mary, which really tries to play, 
though fruitlessly, in the big leagues.  In the 
end, I feel that W&L did it right.

College sports rather bore me.  Cricket does not 
but very few US colleges host cricket teams.

There once was professional cricket in the US but 
its best players went over to baseball once that 
went professional, and it died around 1890.

Marc


msmall at aya.yale.edu
Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!



In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Not cricket)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Not cricket)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Not cricket)