Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]From the point of view of history and precedent I certainly agree. Yet, it remains an interesting philosophical question in the digital age; when the decision is not made when we load the camera, before exposing a frame, but after the exposure, on the computer; where the so-called "straight print" from the "negative" or "transparency" becomes a tad murky Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Apr 20, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote: > Order of historicity, and accepted community standards for BW > imagery, trumps that connection. > S.d. > > > On Apr 20, 2009, at 8:43 AM, George Lottermoser wrote: > >> Interesting question. >> Is black and white (removal of all color) more highly manipulated >> than highly manipulated color? >> On one level - one would have to answer, "yes." >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george at imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:58 AM, Tina Manley wrote: >> >>> Conversion to B&W - the ultimate in manipulation? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information