Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: FF Alice's cherry tree
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:46:49 -0700
References: <49E82345.60801@tele2.fr>

I find the fallen petals to be the most interesting of the shots, followed
by the detail of the single branch.
The tree itself isn't interesting to me, somehow. There is a lot of
information in the shot, it's very centered, and probably is one of those
images that seems like "wow, that's great, I'll get this one and it'll be
wonderful" but then it doesn't translate.

When I find myself in one of those situations I take a LOT of other
pictures, trying as many different angles as I can to see if there's
something I can do to pick up the interest. And clearly you did exactly that
because you offered the shot of the blossoms on the grass and the more
detailed image of the flowering branches. Did you work those as hard? I
suspect there was a lot to do with both of them.

Thanks for sharing and what a great day you had to be out!

Adam

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Philippe AMARD <philippe.amard at 
tele2.fr>wrote:

>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/Paques-1090455-2.jpg.html
> http://tinyurl.com/cqls6g
>
> Plus next one to the right.
>
> C&C most welcome.
> TIA
> Phx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] IMG: FF Alice's cherry tree - Alan)
In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] IMG: FF Alice's cherry tree)