Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]... and may we presume to ask that you actually read the article and ignore the pictures long enough to report back what Playboy has to say about them? On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 5:07 PM, H. Ball Arche <h_arche at yahoo.com> wrote: > > I have that issue of Play boy somewhere (the last staple/fold issue) and > my recollection wasn't that Playboy commisioned the shoot, but bought and > ran the pictures after the fact of Madonna getting big. > > > --- On Thu, 4/30/09, photo1716 at gmail.com <photo1716 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> From: photo1716 at gmail.com <photo1716 at gmail.com> >> Subject: [Leica] Friedlander & Madonna >> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Thursday, April 30, 2009, 2:46 PM >> I doltishly confess my total ignorance of this shoot until I >> read a review of the Friedlander exhibition now in >> Cleveland. After Googling around for a while I still >> haven't gotten to the bottom of it. Friedlander placed >> an ad for a nude model in a local newspaper, Playboy >> comissioned the shoot & a young, Madonna just managed to >> show up by pure coincidence...??? Unbelievable. Does anyone >> have the inside scoop? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more >> information > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >