Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Acquine...automated image quality rating?!
From: douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp)
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 21:49:06 +0200
References: <26935645.1243089395232.JavaMail.root@mswamui-andean.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <4A180DDA.1030001@gmx.de> <99064AD374CE49AD9F557250022B9461@jimnichols>

I actually managed an 89.3 with this one:

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/DMS/Sunglasses.jpg.html  - Not far 
behind Dorothea Lange's Migrant Mother :-)

Cheers
Douglas

Jim Nichols wrote:
> I ran the Rhododrendron photo that I recently posted on the LUG 
> gallery, and got a 77.7.  I think I will stop while I'm ahead.
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Rhody+by+Summicron.tif.html   
> Rated 77.7/100
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Douglas Sharp" <douglas.sharp at 
> gmx.de>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 9:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Acquine...automated image quality rating?!
>
>
>> Some clever people have been running it on famous National Geopgraphic
>> shots, HCB and Dorothea Lange - they didn't rate much at all.
>>
>> Looking at what rated highly, the colour shots almost all seem to be
>> dull red.  Has anyone tried entering some geometrical patterns to find
>> out what the software actually does? I guess a three colour
>> representation of the "rule of thirds" should come in at around 99 %.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Douglas
>>
>>
>>
>> Doug Herr wrote:
>>> THEIN Onn Ming wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> You might find this interesting.
>>> http://acquine.alipr.com/index.php
>>>
>>> It's an algorithm to rate the aesthetics of your images...
>>> <<<
>>>
>>> This is a hoot!  Here's how several of my photos ranked, according 
>>> to this site:
>>>
>>> One of my best-sellers.  Check the inside front cover of Audubon 
>>> magazine September 1974.  Acquine rated it 29.9 out of 100.
>>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/mammals/lagomorphs/pika00.html
>>>
>>> A few others.
>>>
>>> 27.8 http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/trochilidae/ruhu01.jpg
>>>
>>> 7.4  http://www.wildlightphoto.com/land/barley.jpg
>>>
>>> 3    http://www.wildlightphoto.com/land/towercreek.jpg
>>>
>>> 35.7 http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/recurvirostridae/amav01.jpg
>>>
>>> 24   http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/accipitridae/feha02.jpg
>>>
>>> Doug Herr
>>> Birdman of Sacramento
>>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>
>
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Acquine...automated image quality rating?!)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Acquine...automated image quality rating?!)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Acquine...automated image quality rating?!)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Acquine...automated image quality rating?!)