Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] VictorBlad
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:53:13 -0400
 
I agree.
For example I think the sensor on the D40x give a better image than the far
more expensive D200 which is a year older.
Nikon does sit on its hands.
Nor does Canon or any of the other companies. Epson.
Leica.
A year in digital is a decade.


Mark William Rabiner



> From: Thein Onn Ming <mingthein at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 14:09:39 +0800
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] VictorBlad
> 
> No, I get your point - I was just comparing two cameras within the
> same format, but with a few years of development between them. The
> D2x and D5000 are both DX format, but output is like chalk and
> cheese. D5000 wins hands down. D3x is in a whole other league, of
> course.
> 
> On May 28, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
In reply to: Message from mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming) ([Leica] VictorBlad)