Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]How do you do your math? Hassy sensor: 1798.3 sq.mm Leica sensor: 1350 sq.mm That makes the Hassy sensor 33% larger than the Leica one. Or, the other way round, the Leica sensor is 25% smaller than the Hassy one. Either way, the difference is well more than 10%. Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog On Jul 30, 2009, at 4:19 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> Well, that's a no brainer. >> Why would anyone buy a Fuji, when they can buy a Leica for the same >> monies! >> S.d. >> > Format > For people thinking wrongly the Fuji Hassy would be much bigger as > it looks > like cube medium format camera. While the S2 does not look like a > Pentax 67. > > I thought spread would be wide. > Its narrow. > > S2 > 30x45mm sensor 37.5 megapixel CCD > Vs > H3DII-39, > 36.7 x 49.0 mm, 39 Megapixel CCD > > > And the winner goes to Leica for a much more handy camera with a > sensor > which is like %10 less small which is insubstantial. Ditto > Megapixels which > is much less important to me anyway. > > I'm guessing the S2 image quality will be better than then at least > this > particular Hassy H. and maybe some other bigger ones as well in > terms of > Megapixels and actual sensor size. > > > > > Mark William Rabiner > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information