Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9 ? M8
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:15:46 -0400
 
> I would guess that an optimal sample of the best digital lens
> precisely coupled to an optimal sample of the P65+ back
> would equal or surpass print quality
> from many 8x10 negatives.


What would be better than a contact print from an 8x10 neg?
A contact print from an 11x14 neg would be what.

In my mind nothing is going up against a contact print from a large format
neg. certainly not a medium format capture.

Ed Weston does not have to give up his day job yet.
His work is still unsurpassed.


Mark William Rabiner
Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9 " M8)
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9 ? M8)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9 „ M8)
 In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9?M8)