Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: Contax 645 one more time
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:20:08 -0500
References: <36172e5a0908171741w5a5103e2u1ab3a4f65f92645b@mail.gmail.com> <C6AF7FC4.53082%mark@rabinergroup.com> <36172e5a0908171900l65facef7i23bc96d668333d8@mail.gmail.com>
 
It would seem to me
(and I have similar experience
with 'blad, mamiya press,
roll backs on linhof with schneider,
nikon and rodenstock glass, rollei tlr)
that the varied conditions and uses
is exactly why we CAN make valid judgments
about the gear that we've "used."

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Aug 17, 2009, at 9:00 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> What I was saying was that, given all of those varied conditions  
> and uses,
> you really cannot make valid judgements about this format or that
> format, lens brand, sensor size or type.
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] OT: Contax 645 one more time)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT: Contax 645 one more time)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] OT: Contax 645 one more time)