Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] S2 thoughts (was: Re: M9 thoughts!)
From: topoxforddoc at btinternet.com (Charlie Chan)
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:39:36 +0100
References: <1110748.1252702830101.JavaMail.root@wamui-hunyo.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <440b792d0909111415i550d96efke67851356ecaee00@mail.gmail.com> <92A35D1A-0EA6-404F-9119-9D05DFAD486B@gmail.com> <D3485142-2A51-4E2E-8F78-6363A0437642@mac.com> <CDFD3435-8519-48E4-A8D2-36B349CAA865@gmail.com>

No, just a broker!!!

Charlie

Charlie Chan
Cheltenham, UK

On 11 Sep 2009, at 22:38, Steve Barbour wrote:

>
> On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:34 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>
>> (or four people
>> if you've an interest
>> in photographing
>> surviving
>> donors)
>
> are you a lawyer?
>
>
> :-)
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>
>> On Sep 11, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:15 PM, mehrdad wrote:
>>>
>>>> that system costs joust about 70 for a camera and all the  
>>>> announced lenses,
>>>> add the other three and u r looking close to 100k, they were  
>>>> saying on cnn
>>>> over the weekend that kidneys cost 25 each
>>>
>>>
>>> that's one system for every two people,
>>>
>>> trust me I'm a doctor,
>>>
>>>
>>> :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at 
>>>> earthlink.net 
>>>> >wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mark Rabiner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Having just read The Luminous Landscape blubs on Leicas
>>>>>> take no prisoners attack on the entire photo industry
>>>>>> one thing stood out in my mind.
>>>>>> That the size of the S2 is smaller than the D3x and Canon 1Ds Mk3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Leica S2 is a DSLR.
>>>>>> It just happens to be medium format and cost fortune.
>>>>>> And it just happens to blow the results obtained from the Nikon  
>>>>>> and Canons
>>>>>> away.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Having seen the preliminary S2 photos and the ratio of its size  
>>>>> to output
>>>>> quality and DSLR handling and the no-nonsense user interface and  
>>>>> what I've
>>>>> heard about the production camera's responsiveness and manual- 
>>>>> focus-ability
>>>>> I'm completely smitten with it and wish they'd hurry up and get  
>>>>> that 350mm
>>>>> APO-Elmar-S on the market.  Then I'll start selling kidneys on  
>>>>> ebay.
>>>>>
>>>>> Doug Herr
>>>>> Birdman of Sacramento
>>>>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>>> information
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> -------------------------------------
>>>> regards, mehrdad
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] S2 thoughts (was: Re: M9 thoughts!))
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] S2 thoughts (was: Re: M9 thoughts!))
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] S2 thoughts (was: Re: M9 thoughts!))
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] S2 thoughts (was: Re: M9 thoughts!))
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] S2 thoughts (was: Re: M9 thoughts!))