Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] digital vs film
From: pearceww at rmi.net (Warren Pearce)
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:04:43 -0600
References: <181081631.17024911255368593698.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <1056543595.17025131255368613876.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu>

My 5X7 Deardorff doesn't have any needles!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Happiness is a large negative!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


At 11:30 AM 10/12/2009, you wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 : Kyle Cassidy <kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu>wrote:
> >Subject:Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:31:11 -0400
>
> >It would be interestesting to video tape a bunch of shooters 
> working and see if the ones who are chimping are spending more, 
> less, or the same time doing light readings than those watching the 
> needles in-camera.
>====================================================================================================================================================================
>What needles in-camera?   ;~)
>
>M3, M2, IIf,  Rolleiflex user  Alan.
>
>Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
>UPAA POY 1978
>University Information Technology Services
>University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Linda & Warren Pearce
Colorado Springs  




Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] digital vs. film)
In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] digital vs film)