Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] iso 100.000+??
From: clive.moss at gmail.com (Clive Moss)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:58:36 -0500
References: <23a0a61f0910211727j22c205e6k6594e6382ca9c0d6@mail.gmail.com> <440b792d0910211759v42bbb4deh802feadf3d60ef93@mail.gmail.com> <102220090519.3930.4ADFEB610000129400000F5A223045151403010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com>

Kodachrome at 10 ASA. Who needed more? At 25, the world started going
to hell in a handbasket. 50 ASA - BAH, HUMBUG! Who needs it?
--
Clive
Blog:  http://clive.moss.net/blog
Photographs: http://clive.smugmug.com
Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/clive.moss



On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:19 AM,  <grduprey at mchsi.com> wrote:
>
>
> Why do we need iso 100,000? ?I seem to remember we all got along just fine 
> with iso 400 or 800. ?Seems like just a race to see who can supply the 
> highest iso before the next guy.
>
>
> Gene
>
> ?-------------- Original message from mehrdad <msadat at gmail.com>: 
> --------------
>
>
>> i know with the m8 & m9 we are struggling with iso 1250, i guess when m12 
>> is
>> out leica will catch up with todays canon
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:27 PM, simon jessurun wrote:
>>
>> > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0910/09102001canon1d4.aspbest,simon
>> > amsterdam
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Leica Users Group.
>> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ?-------------------------------------
>> ?regards, mehrdad
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Reply from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Reply from wendythurman at gmail.com (Wendy Thurman) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
In reply to: Message from simon.apekop at gmail.com (simon jessurun) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)