Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] I seem to like the dark more than I used to
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:35:54 +0100
References: <mailman.342.1257266283.28189.lug@leica-users.org> <56DBE92D-B744-4DF1-84ED-E6B330A3857F@gmail.com> <a3f189160911031102g13d6b62ev3b141d89ba3eaac8@mail.gmail.com> <3FBCED1B-07B6-4027-B840-A755ED82C1E8@gmail.com> <9FFE17A9-AB08-461A-8F69-01CC1AD1D9E2@frozenlight.eu> <EC3D078E-E033-46D2-A7C2-15250457509C@gmail.com> <532567A8-D3E3-44FF-8A58-BD6335C5B889@frozenlight.eu> <F1E6C0E0-CD9C-462A-B96D-CB34D4F9EAD0@gmail.com>

Hi Steve,

Yes, it was really dark. The image I posted is somewhat cropped so it  
accentuates the brightly lit door etc., but in reality the scene was  
quite dark. I also brought up the shadow level quite a bit in  
Lightroom, otherwise the face of the guy on the left would be even  
darker.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Nov 3, 2009, at 9:02 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:

>
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
>> Here you go:
>>
>> http://www.greatpix.eu/Other/Picture-A-Day/4253606_netUM#701004151_FUZid-O-LB
>
>
> yes, thanks Nathan, I saw this, and I recall this wonderful image  
> and the story that goes with it...
>
> I didn't realize that the room was so dark, it must have looked a  
> lot darker than this appears...
>
>
> Steve
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nathan
>>
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>>
>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:25 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't know...the PAD I posted yesterday was shot with the  
>>>> 1.2/35mm at full aperture, ISO 1250, and the shutter speed was  
>>>> 1/20 sec. I could sure have used some more flexibility there,  
>>>> such as a usable ISO 2500.
>>>
>>>
>>> please give me the url for that Nathan...Steve
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nathan
>>>>
>>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>>> Alicante, Spain
>>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>>>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>>>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>>>>
>>>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>>>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:06 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Sonny Carter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Neil Beddoe <neilbeddoe at 
>>>>>> googlemail.com 
>>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nathan asked about high ISO on the M 9:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I haven't really tried it above 400 much yet except for a few  
>>>>>>> silly shots
>>>>>>> in almost complete darkness at 2500 and f0.95 to see what they  
>>>>>>> looked like.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> shooting the Noctilux open, I have never felt the need to go  
>>>>> about 400-800 ISO...film or digital...
>>>>>
>>>>> wondering about focus though especially wide open in the dark,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have ordered a Leica VF magnifier 1.4, so we'll see...
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have experience specifically under these  
>>>>> circumstances?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Steve
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I like to see silly shots too.  In fact, I seem to have made a  
>>>>>> career of
>>>>>> them.   You get over it after a while. ;-)  Look at  Jim!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sonny
>>>>>> http://www.sonc.com
>>>>>> http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
>>>>>> Natchitoches, Louisiana
>>>>>> (+31.754164,-093.099080)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> USA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>>>> information
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>>> information
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



In reply to: Message from neilbeddoe at googlemail.com (Neil Beddoe) ([Leica] I seem to like the dark more than I used to)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] I seem to like the dark more than I used to)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] I seem to like the dark more than I used to)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] I seem to like the dark more than I used to)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] I seem to like the dark more than I used to)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] I seem to like the dark more than I used to)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] I seem to like the dark more than I used to)