Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:05:38 -0500
References: <149e1b0969c05690a47717ff5d9b96b6@cshore.com>

At 08:22 AM 11/6/2009, you wrote:
>To see how nice cibachromes (aka ilfochromes) could be, visit 
>William ("Bill") Burt's website. He specialty is photographing rare 
>and elusive birds in their nests a night. He also has a great series 
>of marsh photos.  Bill is a superb photographer AND a great printer. 
>He switched to digital printing nearly 10 years ago.
>
>Bill's website is http://www.williamburt.com/about.html
>
>It's well worth a look.
>
>Best to all--Doug


Thanks, Doug!  What beautiful photos!  Here is what he says about his 
printing process:

All larger prints are of the 'archival pigment' ink-jet type, made 
with Epson 'Ultra-Chrome' inks and 'Semi-Matte' paper, and are 
identical to those exhibited by William Burt.  Prints of this process 
are richly colored, exquisitely detailed and subtly toned, and 
remarkably long-lived as well: in all, the finest this photographer 
and printer has ever seen.  Estimated display life: 75 years minimum.

Tina

Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com 


Replies: Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity)
In reply to: Message from dnygr at cshore.com (Douglas Nygren) ([Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity)