Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I, for one, am sold on the notion of a digital M Leica. But it's got to be able to outdo everything else out there. That has not happened yet. S.d. On Nov 10, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Steve Barbour wrote: > > On Nov 10, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Marty Deveney wrote: > >>> Still we shouldn't get our undies yanked up wedgie-high because >>> Dante and >>> Marty and some reviewers don' t like the thing. They make >>> reasonable points. >> >> Please don't misinterpret me - it is an amazing camera and Leica have >> done incredibly well to even make it happen. I wish them all the >> best. But it is not "perfect". I like rangefinder viewing, so the >> camera suited me. But there were things that Leica could have >> improved between the M8 and M9 that they didn't - I pointed these out >> - I think it's a camera reviewer's job to do that. > > so now we can look forward to the M10... > > -I think it's a camera reviewer's job to do that. > > Steve > > > >> >> Marty >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information