Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 4/3 equivalents
From: dennis at hale-pohaku.net (Dennis)
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:51:06 -1000
References: <8523D526-7E3D-411B-8859-7A24A5EEA2B9@charter.net> <1908.68.165.58.219.1260150765.squirrel@mail.expedient.net> <A6C82B8C-1FFD-4890-A1E4-4D2AD6E46C49@charter.net>

That's sort of true but the width/height ratio of 4/3 (1.33) is not the 
same as the 35mm (1,5) format.

With a little trig we can come up with the horizontal, vertical, and 
diagonal angle of view for each.

-Dennis

slobodan Dimitrov wrote:
> Thanks! It dawned on me, after I sent the post, that it is a 2x multiplier.
> S.d.
>
>
> On Dec 6, 2009, at 5:52 PM, The Filippini Family- Matt & Blaise wrote:
>
>   
>> 28-90mm
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>     
>>> What is a 4/3 14-45mm lens equivalent in 35mm?
>>> Thanks.
>>> S.d.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>       
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>   




In reply to: Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] 4/3 equivalents)
Message from filippini at theramp.net (The Filippini Family- Matt & Blaise) ([Leica] 4/3 equivalents)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] 4/3 equivalents)